le 28 février 2007 (18:05)
current location:
My office
current mood: pissed off
current song: The Ramones - "Something to Believe In"
In a prior entry, I mentioned that smart princesses do not join sororities. This is because they cost thousands of dollars in dues, require a lot of time (never mind that college students SHOULD be focusing on their schoolwork, internships, and maybe a job), and ultimately the "lifelong friendships" are based on how attractive or well-to-do the participants are.
I was completely disgusted, but not at all surprised, when a few days ago the New York Times ran an article concerning 23 sorority sisters (including the chapter's president) on a small-town Indiana campus who were kicked out based upon their looks and race.
I am, of course, appalled that this crap still happens in the 21st century. But, I'm flat-out shocked that more people did not expect this to happen somewhere, at some point.
Maman attended UCLA in the 1970s, and hated it because of the elitist Greek system. She made no effort to join any sorority, thinking it redundant because she was already in an association affiliated with the Masons, *and* was planning her wedding as a freshman (in France, the trend is to marry later, but here in America, she was snatched up quickly by my very smart father). Despite making every reasonable effort to be friendly, sorority girls and frat boys (who made up a large chunk of the student population) wouldn't talk to her at all - not even in study groups. It was so bad she transferred to Cal State. Sophie's parents reported similar experiences.
Thinking for a split second that outdated social institutions can change in just 30 years is completely naïve and foolish.
What's especially ironic about this case is that Delta Zeta attracted smart women who didn't fit the sorority sister stereotype (trampy, ditzy, spoiled, blonde, skinny), then decided it was bad for their image to do so. Never mind that sororities might attract more respectable applicants if they didn't discriminate based on looks and image in the first place.
Delta Zeta's national officers have further made complete asses of themselves by doing the following:
*Claiming the booted members were "not sufficiently commited." Never mind one of them was the CHAPTER PRESIDENT, and all of them were non-white, non-skinny, or otherwise not conventionally "pretty."
*Claiming the evictions were made to "enrich" student life. Excuse me, doesn't improved diversity sound like a better way to enrich student life? It takes all kinds to make up this world...students need to learn to get along with each other BEFORE they graduate.
*Allowing "pretty" national representatives to run recruiting events at the house while 25 of the REAL members were hiding upstairs.
*I'm sure they've lied about other things, but really can't be bothered to look them up while I'm at work.
I do, however, commend the DZ sisters who quit in protest.
Frankly, the image-obsessed racist scum who allowed this to happen should be fired, and the sorority should refund EVERY LAST CENT the wronged sisters have paid them over the years. (I know, I know. Snowball's chance in hell. My blog, my rant.)
If any DZ members or alumni are reading this, now is your chance to take a stand. Turn in your pin with a letter condemning the sorority's actions. (I, for the record, turned in my Girl Scout badges when I found out they were allowing 8-year-old Scouts in an Alaska troop to trap aquatic mammals in water traps for a merit badge. Not only is teaching kids to kill animals pretty screwed-up, water traps are especially cruel because a trapped beaver can take up to 20 minutes to drown.)
Don't get me started on a piece run by a local paper a few years ago in which a former sorority sister, writing anonymously from somewhere on another continent, reports such horrors as sisters forcing pledges to stand in their underwear and have all their fat deposits and other "flaws" circled in red ink. The sorority reportedly harassed her for more money in dues after she left, hence the anonymity and her living overseas. Does this sound like a "good opportunity" to "make new friends" to you?
College students of the world, this is your chance to take a stand, too. I do not approve of paying for fake friendships, but if you cannot be convinced not to do so, at least choose a fraternity or sorority that accepts members based upon REAL criteria (intelligence, commitment to an improved community, etc.) rather than popularity and appearance.
I think I'm going to rent the "Revenge of the Nerds" saga this weekend. Everyone should see that movie, if only to be reminded that when you piss off the "socially awkward," you ultimately do so at your own risk. Geeks, much like the math and science majors DZ had attracted in droves, DO own and run the world. (Soph has told me she's tempted to call a global "nerd strike." She may be beautiful and stylish, but she's a geek at heart.)
And I'm continually asked by other people in the fashion industry why I have friends who aren't particularly attractive or cool. They're decent, respectable people. That is all that matters.
Bises,
Frenchy